Regulación ambiental del agua en Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37135/kai.03.06.06Keywords:
Environmental regulation, water, command and control, economic incentives, enforcementAbstract
Water resources are vital to life and economic development, but in Colombia they are under threat by negative externalities from diverse economic sectors. Water resource protection depends fundamentally on the quality and effectiveness of environmental regulation and Colombia seems to be an international reference point on environmental institutionalization given its completeness and comprehensiveness. However, Colombian water resources have declined in quality and availability over the last years. This reality motivated the development of an exhaustive analysis of Colombian water environmental regulation with an economic perspective. This article includes a review of the characteristics of these regulations concluding that the deterioration of water quality is not only the result of increasing population and economic development, but also of regulatory shortcomings due to institutional weakness, lack of enforcement, and the influence of interest groups.
Downloads
References
Abbasi, T., & Abbasi, S. A. (2012). The Biotic Indices. In Water Quality Indices (pp. 219–247). Doi: 10.1016/b978-0-444-54304-2.00013-0
Bergek, A., & Berggren, C. (2014). The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: A review of energy and automotive industry studies. Ecological Economics, 106, 112–123. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.016
Blackman, A. (2009). Colombia’s discharge fee program: Incentives for polluters or regulators? Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1), 101–119. Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.010
Botero, R. (2017). Marco legal del control fiscal ambiental en Colombia. Contraloría General de la República de Colombia [WWW Document]. http://media.utp.edu.co/centro-gestion-ambiental/archivos/mod-v-analisis-macroeconomico-ambiental/02marcolegaldelcontrolfiscalambientalencolombia.pdf
Brown, R., McClelland, N., Deininger, R., y Tozer, R. (1970). A Water Quality Index- Do We Dare. Water Sew. Work. 117(10), 339–343.
Contraloría General de la República – Contraloría delegada para el Medio Ambiente (2015). La sostenibilidad ambiental en el Plan Nacional de Desarrollo: avance o retroceso. Economía colombiana, 344, 67-75.
Contraloría General de la República (2014). Informe del Estado de los Recursos Naturales 2012/2013. http://campusvirtual.contraloria.gov.co/campus/5biblio/biblio_informe_MedioAmbiente.html
El Espectador (2015). Así quedó la ley de Zidres. https://www.elespectador.com/noticias/politica/asi-quedo-la-ley-de-zidres/
Guerrero, T. A., Furlong, K., & Arias, J. (2016). Complicating neoliberalization and decentralization: The non-linear experience of Colombian water supply, 1909–2012. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 32(2), 172-188.
Hernández, M.C., Saldarriaga, V., Cháves, D.A., 2010. Evaluación de las transferencias del sector eléctrico a las CAR y a los municipios. Econ. Colomb. 330, 66–80.
IDEAM (2014). Estudio Nacional del Agua 2014. Bogotá - Colombia.
Kathuria, V. (2006). Controlling water pollution in developing and transition countries—lessons from three successful cases. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(4), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.05.007
Kugler, M., & Rosenthal, H. (2000). Checks and balances: an assessment of the institutional separation of political powers in Colombia.
Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo, 2015. Negocios verdes y desarrollo sostenible [WWW Document]. Plantilla negocios verdes y Desarro. Sosten. URL https://www.minambiente.gov.co/index.php/component/content/article?id=1434:plantilla-negocios-verdes-y-sostenibles-51#información-de-interés
Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo, 2014. Guía Técnica para la formulación de los POMCAS. Bogotá - Colombia.
Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo, 2010. Metodología general para la presentación de estudios ambientales.
Monahan, K. 2019. “Ecuador’s fuel protests show the risks of removing fossil fuel subsidies too fast,” The Conversation, October 31.
Moncada, J. Pérez, C. y Valencia, G. (2013). Comunidades organizadas y el servicio público de agua potable en Colombia: una defensa de la tercera opción económica desde la teoría de recursos de uso común. Ecos de Economía, 17(37). pp. 125-159.
Ménard, C., & Shirley, M. M. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5
OECD, 2014. OECD Environmental Performance Reviews. OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Colombia 2014.
Ostrom, E., 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity, Public Choice. Doi:10.1007/s11127-007-9157-x
Peláez, C., 2015. Entrevista profesor Carlos Peláez.
Rodríguez, C., 2012. La paradoja de las instituciones en Colombia: un análisis sociológico, en: Las Instituciones En Colombia. Un Análisis Sociológico. pp. 56–85.
Sánchez, A., 2011. Reformas fiscales verdes y la hipótesis del doble dividendo: un ejercicio aplicado a la economía colombiana. Doc. Trab. sobre Econ. Reg. 49.
Supersociedades, 2015. Sistema de Información y Reporte Empresarial -SIREM- [WWW Document]. URL http://www.supersociedades.gov.co/asuntos-economicos-y-contables/estudios-y-supervision-por-riesgos/SIREM/Paginas/default.aspx
Tacconi, L. (2012). Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 73, 29–36. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.028
Tobón Orozco D. & Vasco, C.A. (2019). Mecanismos de política económica ambiental: retos en la prestación del servicio de aseo en grandes ciudades. Universidad de Antioquia. https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=en&lr=&id=q4aWDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=info:x2_kdw_yaTsJ:scholar.google.com&ots=amcCjGwD63&sig=hzBW6FvzVl3908r4cvRcVukazVI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Tobón Orozco, D., Molina, C., & Vasco, C.A. (2018), Riesgo de desabastecimiento en la provisión de agua potable en grandes ciudades y políticas económicas ambientales híbridas, Colciencias & Universidad de Antioquia.
Hitzhusen, F. J. (2000). Greening Industry: New Roles for Communities, Markets and Governments. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29(6), 2049–2050. Doi: 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900060050x
UPME, 2015. Proyectos de Eficiencia Energética [WWW Document]. https://www1.upme.gov.co/paginas/demanda-y-eficiencia-energetica.aspx
Chandler, R., Rougier, J., & Collins, M. (2010). Climate change. Significance, 7(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2010.00403.x
Wills, M., Irvine, K., 1996. Application of the National Sanitation Foundation Water Quality Index in Cazenovia Creek, NY, Pilot Watershed Management Project. Middle States Geogr. 95–104.
Kugler, M. & Rosental, M. (2000). Checks and balances: an assessment of the institutional separtion of political powers in Colombia, Working Papers Series. Documentos de Trabajo 002117, Fedesarrollo.
Wijen, F., & van Tulder, R. (2011). Integrating environmental and international strategies in a world of regulatory turbulence. California management review, 53(4), 23-46.
Yale University, 2015. Environmental Performance Index [WWW Document]. Yale Cent. Environ. Law Policy. URL http://epi.yale.edu/ (accessed 12.21.15).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
By submitting his work to Kairós, Journal of economic, law and administrative sciences, the author assigns the editor in a non-exclusive manner the rights of reproduction, publication, public communication, distribution and transformation so that it can be published in the journal in electronic version and can be consulted from the magazine's website.
Likewise, the authors authorize their article to be published under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-NC-ND license.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own website) after publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation. of published works (See The Effect of Open Access).
![Manual de marca](https://i.ibb.co/8mRCcNn/logo-para-manual-de-marca-Kair-s.png"){kind=logo}
