KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS AND INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES IN COLOMBIAN CONGLOMERATES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37135/kai.03.16.01

Keywords:

Innovation, clusters, university-business cooperation, knowledge networks, Colombia

Abstract

This study examines how cooperation with universities and research centers mediates the relationship between cluster membership and innovative performance in Colombian companies in the manufacturing and service sectors. It argues that universities act as catalysts for knowledge, strengthening firms' capacity to generate innovations. Using an empirical model that combines probit and logit analysis for binary variables and Poisson and Zero-inflated Poisson analysis for counts, three main hypotheses are evaluated: that companies in clusters that cooperate with universities are more innovative; that such cooperation has a mediating effect; and that this effect is more pronounced in services than in manufacturing. The expected results seek to provide evidence on the importance of academic networks in strengthening business innovation, as well as to guide policies and strategies for university-business coordination in the Colombian context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105

Álvarez, R., & Robertson, R. (2004). Exposure to foreign markets and plant-level innovation: Evidence from Chile and Mexico. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 13(1), 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963819042000213543

Ankrah, S., & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003

Arango, M., & Páez, J. (2022). Colaboración universidad–empresa y desempeño innovador en sectores intensivos en conocimiento en Colombia. Revista de Economía del Caribe, (30), 45–68.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Barrios Aguirre, F., & Cárcamo Vergara, A. (2013). Innovación y competitividad en las empresas manufactureras de la Región Caribe colombiana. Revista Economía y Región, 7(2), 119–147.

Barrios Aguirre, F., Pérez, J., & Ríos, M. (2023). Determinantes de la innovación en economías emergentes: Evidencia reciente para Colombia. Cuadernos de Economía, 42(118), 89–114.

Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (Eds.). (2005). Clusters, networks, and innovation: Research results and new directions (capítulo y colección). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199275557.001.0001

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE). (2021). Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica (EDIT IX). Bogotá, D.C.: DANE.

Departamento Nacional de Planeación (DNP). (2019). Política nacional de ciencia, tecnología e innovación: Hacia una economía basada en el conocimiento. Bogotá, D.C.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Giuliani, E. (2007). The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: Evidence from the wine industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl014

Guatibonza Tamayo, D. (2021). Capital humano, cooperación universidad–empresa y desempeño innovador en Colombia. Revista de Economía Institucional, 23(45), 123–148.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers.

Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Main Science and Technology Indicators. OECD Publishing.

Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90. https://hbr.org/1998/11/clusters-and-the-new-economics-of-competition

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988

Tether, B. S. (2005). Do services innovate (differently)? Insights from the European Innobarometer survey. Industry and Innovation, 12(2), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710500087891

Published

2026-01-21

How to Cite

Salinas-Romero, J. S., & Barrios-Aguirre, F. (2026). KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS AND INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES IN COLOMBIAN CONGLOMERATES. Kairos: Journal of Economy, Law and Administrative Sciences, 9(16), 9-41. https://doi.org/10.37135/kai.03.16.01