PREFERENCES FOR DISTANCE EDUCATION: AN ANALYSIS FROM CONSUMER BEHAVIOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37135/kai.03.14.05Keywords:
distance education, consumer behavior, preferences, bounded rationalityAbstract
The preferences of Economics students towards distance education are analyzed, considering their experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. The information was collected through a structured questionnaire, divided into sections that address demographic data, satisfaction with distance education, and technological adoption factors based on the UTAUT model. An ordinal probabilistic model was applied to identify the determinants of the preference for the distance modality. The results show that satisfaction, perceived compatibility, quality of information and teacher support increase the probability of preferring this modality. However, a high perception of effort decreases this probability. It is concluded that satisfaction and institutional quality are key to the adoption of this modality.
Downloads
References
Águeda, B., Dogan, K., Khanna, K., Masis, M., Monge, R., Tugtan, M., Vega, L. & Vig, R. (2021). Changes That Should Remain in Higher Education Post COVID-19: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of the Experiences at Three Universities. Higher Learning Research Communications, 11 (0), 51-75. https://10.18870/hlrc.v11i0.1195
Aksoy, Y. (2021). Attitudes of Postgraduate Students Towards Distance Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: North Cyprus Example. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.766183.
Al-Mawee, W., Kwayu, K., & Gharaibeh, T. (2021). Student's perspective on distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of Western Michigan University, United States. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100080 - 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100080.
Barton, D. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on field instruction and remote teaching alternatives: Results from a survey of instructors. Ecology and Evolution, 10, 12499-12507. https://10.1002/ece3.6628
Castro, E. & George, J. (2021). The Impact of COVID-19 on Student Perceptions of Education and Engagement. e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 15 (1), 28-39.
Clary, W., Dick, G., Akbulut, A., & Slyke, C. (2022). The After Times: College Students' Desire to Continue with Distance Learning Post Pandemic. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 50, 3. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05003.
Contreras, C., Picazo, A., Cordero, A. & Chaparro, M. (2021). Challenges of Virtual Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experiences of Mexican University Professors and Students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20 (3), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.3.12
Estrada, E., Gallegos, N. & Puma, M. (2022). Percepción de los estudiantes universitarios sobre la educación virtual durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Revista San Gregorio, 49, 74-89.
García, H. & Pascucci, E. (2022). Del aprendizaje tradicional al e-learning en el contexto de la pandemia por Covid-19; valoraciones por alumnos universitarios. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 40, 236-251. https://10.5944/reec.40.2022.30176
Guerrero, M. (2015). Aplicación del modelo de Kano al análisis de la satisfacción de los estudiantes en los cursos de formación online. Tesis doctoral Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
Hernández, P. & Díaz, D. (2024). Preferences for Study Modalities Based on the Experience of E-Learning in Pandemics. Higher Education Forum, 21(3), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.15027/55008
Klaes, M., & Sent, E. (2005). Una historia conceptual del surgimiento de la racionalidad limitada. Historia de la economía política, 37, 27-59. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-37-1-27
Masalimova, A., Khvatova, M., Chikileva, L., Zvyagintseva, E., Stepanova, V., & Melnik, M. (2022). Distance Learning in Higher Education During Covid-19. Frontiers, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.822958
Matarirano, O., Gqokonqana, O. & Yeboah, A. (2021). Students’ Responses to Multi-Modal Emergency Remote Learning During COVID-19 in a South African Higher Institution. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 6 (2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2021.19
Melo, G., Sanhueza, D., Morales, S., & Peña-Lévano, L. (2021). What does the Pandemic Mean for Experiential Learning? Lessons from Latin America, 3, 131-146. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.313690.
Mollá, A. (2006). Estrategia de Marketing y comportamiento del consumidor. En Mollá, A. Comportamiento del Consumidor, Bogotá: Editorial UOC, 13-38.
Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K.S. & Jha, G. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3 (1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101
Ploj, M., Dolenc, K. & Sorgo, A. (2021). Changes in Online Distance Learning Behaviour of University Students during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak, and development of the Model of Forced Distance Online Learning Preferences. European Journal of Educational Research, 10 (1), 393-411.
Rizun, M., & Strzelecki, A. (2020). Students’ Acceptance of the COVID-19 Impact on Shifting Higher Education to Distance Learning in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186468
Roy, S. & Covelli, B. (2021). COVID-19 Induced Transition from Classroom to Online Mid Semester: Case Study on Faculty and Students’ Preferences and Opinions. Higher Learning Research Communications, 11 (0), 10-32. https:// 10.18870/hlrc.v11i0.1197
Salas-Pilco, S. (2022). The Impact of COVID-19 on Latin American STEM Higher Education: A Systematic Review. 2022 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE53672.2022.9782354
Sent, E. (2018). Racionalidad y racionalidad limitada: no se puede tener una sin la otra. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25, 1370-1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2018.1523206
Sotelo, M., Barrera, L., Echeverría, B. & Ramos, D. (2022). Aprendizaje percibido de estudiantes universitarios en cursos en modalidad presencial y mixta: un estudio comparativo. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 21 (1), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.21.1.115
Stevanović, A., Božić, R., & Radović, S. (2021). Higher education students' experiences and opinion about distance learning during the Covid‐19 pandemic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37, 1682 - 1693. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12613
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kairos: Journal of Economy, Law and Administrative Sciences
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b52d/0b52d46edc111e449a0fbf055f579b35f69999ca" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright
By submitting his work to Kairós, Journal of economic, law and administrative sciences, the author assigns the editor in a non-exclusive manner the rights of reproduction, publication, public communication, distribution and transformation so that it can be published in the journal in electronic version and can be consulted from the magazine's website.
Likewise, the authors authorize their article to be published under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-NC-ND license.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own website) after publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation. of published works (See The Effect of Open Access).