EVALUATION OF TEACHING PERFORMANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37135/kai.03.13.02Keywords:
evaluation, teaching performance, evaluation modelsAbstract
Studying the evaluation of teaching performance in higher education is important because it is a process that influences the quality of the provision of the teaching service as well as the educational system. The objective of this research is to understand the evaluation of teaching performance. A set of articles consulted in high-level scientific journals are analyzed and the bibliometric analysis of productivity, impact and collaboration is presented. The results consolidate empirical studies to identify opportunities and a research agenda that contributes to the theoretical advancement of both performance evaluation and its application in the educational field.
Downloads
References
Aguilar, L., Parraga, C. y Gracia, K. (2022). Development of a faculty satisfaction questionnaire for Ecuadorian higher institutions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-03-2022-0097.
Angel-Urdinola, D. y Davila, S. (2019). Using Student and Teacher Assessments to Design More Pertinent In-Service Teacher Training: The Case of Ecuador. Labor: Personnel Economics eJournal. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8970.
Almeida, J. (2017). Teacher Performance Evaluation: The Importance of Performance Standards. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 8, 2973-2981. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2017.0404.
Cai, Y. y Lin, C. (2006). Theory and practice on teacher performance evaluation. Frontiers of Education in China, 1, 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11516-005-0004-X.
Chukwubikem, P. (2013). Developing Better Teacher Evaluation. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3, 49. https://doi.org/10.5901/JESR.2013.V3N6P49.
Cordero, G. y González, C. (2016). The performance teacher evaluation model in Mexican educational reform. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(46). https://doi.org/10.14507/EPAA.24.2242.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070.
Ellegaard, O. (2017). The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects. Scientometrics, 116, 181-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2765-z.
Freire-Aillón, T. M., López Sevilla, G. M. y Jiménez Bósquez, D. A. (2020). La psicología positiva aplicada en el proceso de evaluación docente de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador – Ambato. INNOVA Research Journal, 5(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v5.n1.2020.1036
García, M. (2018). La evaluación integral del desempeño docente de los profesores universitarios. Yachana Revista Científica, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.62325/10.62325/yachana.v6.n2.2017.479
Guerrero-Quiñonez, A., Guagua, O., Quiñonez-Alava, M., & Barrera-Proaño, R. (2023). The evaluation of teaching performance in Ecuadorian higher education. Ibero-American Journal of Education & Society Research, 3(1), 249-253. https://doi.org/10.56183/iberoeds.v3i1.624.
Jácome-Ortega, A., Caraguay-Procel, J., Herrera-Granda, E., & Granda, I. (2019). Confirmatory Factorial Analysis Applied on Teacher Evaluation Processes in Higher Education Institutions of Ecuador. Technology, Sustainability and Educational Innovation (TSIE), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37221-7_14.
Jaramillo, I., Pico, R. y Plata, C. (2017). A Model for Faculty Evaluation in Higher Education Ecuadorian through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Indian journal of science and technology, 10, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.17485/IJST/2017/V10I18/110443.
Jyothi, G. y Parvathi, C. (2014). Fuzzy Expert Model for Evaluation of Faculty Performance in Technical Educational Institutions. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4, 41-50.
Kimball, S., White, B., Milanowski, A., & Borman, G. (2004). Examining the Relationship Between Teacher Evaluation and Student Assessment Results in Washoe County. Peabody Journal of Education, 79, 54 - 78. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327930pje7904_4.
Li, W. y Wang, Y. (2015). Research on the Performance Evaluation Model of Higher Education Teachers Based on the Improved Grey Clustering Analysis Method. Interactive Computer Aided Learning, 10(8), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i8.5220.
Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of University teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 253-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2
Mohammadi, M. (2021). Dimensions of Teacher Performance Evaluation by Students in Higher Education. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(2), 2021, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.34293/EDUCATION.V9I2.3673.
Morales, J. (2022). The Evaluation of Teacher Performance in Higher Education. International Journal of Science and Society, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v4i3.507.
Perpétuo, L. y Pestana, J. (2020). Modelo de Evaluación de Competencias: Desafios e Perspectivas [Model of Evaluation of Competencies: Challenges and Perspectives]. Revista de Administración y Educación, 14(51), 12-25.
Pratt, D. (1997). Reconceptualizing the evaluation of teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 34, 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003046127941.
Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079112331382944.
Rendón, N. y Ayala, J. (2023). Relationship between comprehensive teacher performance evaluation and quality in higher education. Revista Científica Ciencia y Tecnología, 23(38), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.47189/rcct.v23i38.565
Tejedor, F. (2003). Un modelo de evaluación del profesorado universitario. Revista de investigación educativa, 21(1), 157-182.
Thanassoulis, E., Dey, P., Petridis, K., Goniadis, I., & Georgiou, A. (2017). Evaluating higher education teaching performance using combined analytic hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(4), 431-445. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0165-4.
Thompson, D. y Walker, C. (2015). A Descriptive and Historical Review of Bibliometrics with Applications to Medical Sciences. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 35(6), 551-559. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1586.
Schneider, B., Estarellas, P., & Bruns, B. (2019). The Politics of Transforming Education in Ecuador: Confrontation and Continuity, 2006–2017. Comparative Education Review, 63(2), 259 - 280. https://doi.org/10.1086/702609.
Sledge, A. y Pazey, B. (2013). Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through Meaningful Evaluation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36, 231 - 246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413489839.
Soto-Estrada, E., Wellens, A. y Gómez-Lizarazo, J. (2018). Student course evaluation: a process-based approach. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 23, 83 - 94. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2018.1557099.
Spooren, P., Brockx, B. y Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching. Review of Educational Research, 83, 598 - 642. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313496870.
Zabaleta, F. (2007). The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 55 - 76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510601102131.
Zhao, L., Xu, P., Chen, Y. y Yan, S. (2022). A literature review of the research on students’ evaluation of teaching in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004487.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kairos: Journal of Economy, Law and Administrative Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright
By submitting his work to Kairós, Journal of economic, law and administrative sciences, the author assigns the editor in a non-exclusive manner the rights of reproduction, publication, public communication, distribution and transformation so that it can be published in the journal in electronic version and can be consulted from the magazine's website.
Likewise, the authors authorize their article to be published under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-NC-ND license.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own website) after publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation. of published works (See The Effect of Open Access).
![Manual de marca](https://i.ibb.co/8mRCcNn/logo-para-manual-de-marca-Kair-s.png"){kind=logo}
