ESTRUCTURA ECONÓMICA Y POBREZA EN MÉXICO, 2008-2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37135/kai.03.08.08Keywords:
economic structure, structural change, productivity, análisis de datosAbstract
This study analyzes the economic structure and whether the changes it experiences are linked to and affect poverty in Mexico and the states that comprise it. Therefore, the GDP and employment sectoral participation, the intersectoral effect (EI), and the reassignment effect (ER) of employment towards high productivity sectors in the States that make up the country are estimated, and Coneval poverty indices are also used in the analysis. The evidence confirms that the sectoral participation with respect to GDP and employment tends to increase in the services sector and that in the country, the increase in productivity is mainly attributed to RE; however, the activities to which employment is relocated in the states are primarily non-industrial activities. Finally, it was found that the poverty reduction is explained by economic growth, the participation of the secondary and tertiary sectors of the economy, but not by the reallocation effect, which denotes the non-existence of a structural change in the Mexican economy.
Downloads
References
Andersen, R. (2008). Modern Methods for Robust Regression. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-152.
Berthélemy, J. (2018). Growth Acceleration, Structural Change, and Poverty Reduction in Africa and Poverty Reduction in Africa. African Economic Outlook 2018.
Bramati, M. C., & Croux, C. (2007). Robust estimators for the fixed effects panel data model. The Econometrics Journal, 10(3), 521–540. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23126789
Calderón-Villarreal, C., & Hernández-Bielma, L. (2016). Cambio estructural y desindustrialización en México. Panorama Económico, 12(23), 29-54.
Campos, R. M., y Luis, V. (2016). La relación entre crecimiento económico y pobreza en México. Investigación Económica, 75(298), 77–113.
Carrillo Arteaga, B. E., y Cadena Vargas, E. (2019). Terciarización y configuración espacial en México. Acta Universitaria, 29.
Ceballos Mina O., y De Anda Casas E. A. (2021). Estructura productiva laboral y pobreza en México: análisis municipal en tres regiones". Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, 88(2021), 129-168. https://doi.org/10.13043/DYS.88.4
Cimoli, M. (2005). Cambio estructural, heterogeneidad productiva y tecnológica en América Latina. En M. Cimoli (Ed.), Heterogeneidad estructural, asimetrías tecnológicas y crecimiento en América Latina. 9–39. Santiago: CEPAL.
Cimoli, M., G. Dosi and J.E. Stiglitz (2009) Industrial Policy and Development. The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation. Oxford University Press.
Cimoli, M., G. Porcile y S. Rovira (2010). Structural change and the BOP-constraint: why did Latin America fail to converge? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(2), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben060
Cimoli, M., Neto, A. M., Porcile, G., & Sossdorf, F. (2015). Productivity, social expenditure, and income distribution in Latin America. CEPAL Production Development, 201.
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política Social (2016). Evolución de las Dimensiones de la pobreza 1990-2014. Ciudad de México.
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política Social (2019). 10 años de medición de la pobreza en México, avances y retos en política social. Comunicado de prensa No. 10. Ciudad de México.
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política Social (2020). Actualización de las Líneas de Pobreza por Ingreso. Ciudad de México.
Correa, F. (2016). Pobreza, desigualdad y estructura productiva en ciudades. Serie Desarrollo Productivo Cepal, (207), 1–42.
Dasgupta, S., & Singh, A. (2006). Manufacturing, services, and premature de-industrialisation in developing countries: a kaldorian empirical analysis. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge Working Paper, 327.
Diao, X., McMillan, M., & Rodrik, D. (2019). The recent growth boom in developing economies: A structural-change perspective. The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics (pp. 281-334).
Dutt, A. K. (2019). Structuralists, Structures, and Economic Development. In the Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics (pp. 109-141).
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, ECLAC (2012). Cambio estructural para la igualdad: una visión integrada del desarrollo. Santiago.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, ECLAC (2007) Los objetivos de desarrollo del Milenio y los desafíos para América Latina y el Caribe para avanzar en mayor bienestar, mejor capital humano y más igualdad de oportunidades. Documento de proyecto. Santiago.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, ECLAC (2016) Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago.
Harvey, D. (2007). Breve historia del neoliberalismo (Vol. 49). Ediciones Akal.
Haraguchi, Nobuya & Cheng, Charles Fang Chin & Smeets, Eveline, (2017). The Importance of Manufacturing in Economic Development: Has This Changed? World Development, 93(may), 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.013
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). 2018. Banco de Información Económica (BIE). México.
International Labor Organization. (2015). Indicadores Clave del Mercado de Trabajo 2015: Informe completo. Oficina Internacional del Trabajo. Ginebra.
Lanzarotti, M. (1991). Chocs exogenes, ajustement et changement structurel en Corée du Sud. Revue Tiers Monde, 32(127), 633–653.
Lavopa, A., y Szirmai, A. (2012). Industrialization, employment, and poverty. UNU-MERIT Working Papers.
Longhi, F., & Osatinsky, A. (2017). Estructura productiva, pobreza y problemas de empleo en las provincias pampeanas y norteñas de Argentina en los primeros años del siglo XXI. Cuadernos de Geografía: Revista Colombiana de Geografía, 26(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcdg.v26n1.51011
Loría, Eduardo. (2009). Sobre el lento crecimiento económico de México: Una explicación estructural. Investigación económica, 68(270), 37-68.
McMillan, M. S. y Rodrik, D. (2011). Globalization, Structural Change and Productivity Growth. NBER Working Paper No. 17143. Cambridge.
McMillan, M., Rodrik, D., y Verduzco-Gallo. (2014). Globalization, Structural Change, and Productivity Growth, with an Update on Africa. World Development, 63, 11–32.
Moncayo, E. (2008). Cambio estructural: trayectoria y vigencia de un concepto. Structural change: Path and Validity of a concept. Revista CIFE, 32(13), 235–249.
Padilla-Pérez, R., y Villarreal, F. G. (2017). Structural change and productivity growth in Mexico, 1990–2014. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 41, 53–63.
Pasinetti, L.L. (1973). The notion of vertical integration in economic analysis. Metroeconomica, vol. 25, No 1.
Pasinetti, L.L. (1981). Structural Change and Economic Growth. A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Prebisch, R. (1949), El desarrollo de la América Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas, Santiago, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
Prebisch, R. (1967), Hacia una dinámica del desarrollo latinoamericano, vol. 2, Ediciones de la Banda Oriental.
Silva E. G. and A.C. Teixeira, (2008). Surveying structural change: Seminal contributions and a bibliometric account. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19(4), 273-300.
Storm, S. (2015). Structural change. Development and Change, 46(4), 666–699.
Tello, M. D. (2015). Poverty, growth, structural change, and social inclusion programs: a regional analysis of Peru. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 15(2), 59–78.
United Nations Organization for Industrial Development. (2012). Structural Change, Poverty Reduction and Industrial Policy in the BRICS, 1–179.
World Bank, (2018). Según Banco Mundial, la pobreza extrema a nivel mundial continúa disminuyendo, aunque a un ritmo más lento. Comunicado de prensa del Banco Mundial. Washington.
Yoguel E. Y Barletta F. (2017). ¿De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de cambio estructural? Manufactura y cambio estructural: Aportes para pensar la política industrial en la Argentina (27-54). Santiago: CEPAL.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kairos: Journal of Economy, Law and Administrative Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright
By submitting his work to Kairós, Journal of economic, law and administrative sciences, the author assigns the editor in a non-exclusive manner the rights of reproduction, publication, public communication, distribution and transformation so that it can be published in the journal in electronic version and can be consulted from the magazine's website.
Likewise, the authors authorize their article to be published under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-NC-ND license.
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-NC-ND license.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own website) after publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation. of published works (See The Effect of Open Access).
![Manual de marca](https://i.ibb.co/8mRCcNn/logo-para-manual-de-marca-Kair-s.png"){kind=logo}
