BIOETHICS: FROM THE NUREMBERG CODE TO JURISPRUDENCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37135/kai.03.12.01

Keywords:

bioética, código de Núremberg, informe Belmont, declaración de Helsinki, jurisprudencia

Abstract

The bioethical parameters developed after the Second World War and their influence on jurisprudence are presented, starting from the question of judicial recognition and its role in the juridification of bioethics. To reflect on this question, the concept of bioethics developed from the Nuremberg code is analyzed, reviewing the importance of this code, as well as other instruments such as the Belmont report and the Declaration of Helsinki. Cases where medical relationships were judicialized due to ethical issues are also identified

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atienza, Manuel (1998) Juridificar la bioética. Edición digital a partir de Isonomía: Revista de Teoría y Filosofía del Derecho, 8 (abril 1998), 75-99. https://www.cervantesvirtual.com/obra/juridificar-la-biotica-0/

Beauchamp, T. y Childress, J. (1999). Principios de ética médica. Masson, Barcelona.

Gracia, D. (1989). Fundamentos de Bioética. Eudema Universidad, Madrid.
Sánchez de Miguel, M., Iturbide L.M., Lizaso I. (2012). La inteligencia militar norteamericana y el uso ambivalente de la psicología desde una perspectiva histórica: el programa Handicrafts (1941) y el proyecto Mkultra (1953). Revista de historia de la psicología, 33(3), 37-48.

Owen, J. (2007). Núremberg, el mayor juicio de la historia. Barcelona, Editorial Crítica.

Parker, L. (1997). La mala sangre todavía fluye en el estudio de Tuskegee. Tuskegee University. http://www.tuskegee.edu/global/Story.asp?s=1209852.

Valdés, E. (2014). ¿Es posible juridificar la bioética? Academia Chilena de la Medicina. https://medicina.udd.cl/centro-bioetica/files/2015/06/Bol-Acad-Chil-Med-Capitulo-E-Valdes.pdf

Wilches Flores, A.M. (2011) La propuesta Bioética de Van Rensselaer Potter, cuatro décadas después. Revista opción, 27(66), 70-84. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/310/31022314005.pdf. Consultado el 19-01-2023 p 72

Wikilanguages. https://wikilanguages.net/espanol/Juridificar.html#uses.

Casos
Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos de América, Caso Buck vs. Bell (1927). Resumen disponible en: https://lecturasconstitucionaleseua.juridicas.unam.mx/sentencias-tseu/buck-vs-bell-1927/

Roe contra Wade. Antecedentes e impacto. En: Planned Parenthood, Federations of America.

DW. Debate ético en torno al caso Schiavo. https://www.dw.com/es/debate-%C3%A9tico-en-torno-al-caso-schiavo/a-1529816 http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/bioethicist-tk-n333536.

Espinosa, Armando Garduño (2010) Dilemas éticos y toma de decisiones en Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales. Caso Baby Doe. Disponible en: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/bmhim/hi-2010/hi103i.pdf Consultado el 25-04-23

Video fuentes
CHV Noticias (2022). EN SÍNTESIS | MK-Ultra: El programa secreto de la CIA para realizar experimentos de control mental. Video en línea. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64DVehEfIog. Consultado 14 de enero de 2023.

Documentos
Declaración de Helsinki de la Asociación Médica Mundial. https://medicina.udd.cl/centro-bioetica/files/2010/10/declaracion_helsinski.pdf. Consultado el 15-01-2023

Informe Belmont. (abril-1979) Principios y guías éticos para la protección de los sujetos humanos de investigación. Comisión Nacional para la protección de los sujetos humanos de investigación biomédica y del comportamiento” que producirá su informe en abril de 1979, disponible en: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://www.bioeticayderecho.ub.edu/archivos/norm/InformeBelmont.pdf / Consultado el 23-02-23

Resoluciones
Organización de Naciones Unidas. Resolución 2625. https://www.dipublico.org/3971/resolucion-2625-xxv-de-la-asamblea-general-de-naciones-unidas-de-24-de-octubre-de-1970-que-contiene-la-declaracion-relativa-a-los-principios-de-derecho-internacional-referentes-a-las-relaciones-de.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-15

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 12 (2024): Kairós, Revista de Ciencias Económicas, Jurídicas y Administrativas

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Kairos: Journal of Economy, Law and Administrative Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright

By submitting his work to Kairós, Journal of economic, law and administrative sciences, the author assigns the editor in a non-exclusive manner the rights of reproduction, publication, public communication, distribution and transformation so that it can be published in the journal in electronic version and can be consulted from the magazine's website.

Likewise, the authors authorize their article to be published under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-NC-ND license.

The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-NC-ND license.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own website) after publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation. of published works (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite

BIOETHICS: FROM THE NUREMBERG CODE TO JURISPRUDENCE. (2024). Kairos: Journal of Economy, Law and Administrative Sciences, 7(12), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.37135/kai.03.12.01