The Principle of quality: your challenges from administrative law in Ecuador

Authors

  • Edison Barba-Tamayo Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37135/kai.03.07.01

Keywords:

Calidad, administración pública, derecho administrativo, eficiencia, eficacia

Abstract

This article is a critical reflection on the conception and implications of quality, maintaining the thesis that affirms it as an abstract and ambiguous legal principle, with limitations that are uniquely concrete. Based on the legal framework in Ecuador, tensions are defined between management and law, with an emphasis on the academic accommodation of administrative principles in the legal world. It is concluded that quality is a mandate that involves the obligatory fulfillment by the administrations, defining efficiency and effectiveness as consubstantial to materialize it in the public function and thus satisfy the needs of the citizens; however, the measurement of its scope and consequent guarantee is still incipient in administrative law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexy, R. (1997). El concepto y la validez del Derecho. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Ávila Santamaría, R. (2012). Los derechos y sus garantías, ensayos críticos. Quito: Centro de estudios y difusión del derecho constitucional.

Becerra Arteaga, Á., & Andino Garnica, P. (2020). Comentarios al código orgánico administrativo COA. Quito: Talleres de la CEP.

Código Orgánico Administrativo. (2017). Ecuador: Registro Oficial N° 111.

Constitución de la República del Estado. (2008). Ecuador: Registro Oficial N°653.

Hernández, H., Barrios, I., & Martínez, D. (2018). Gestión de la calidad: elemento clave para el desarrollo de las organizaciones. Criterio Libre, 169-185. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6676025

Hinostroza Minguez, A. (2017). Proceso Contencioso Administrativo. Lima: Jurista editores.

Ley Orgánica de Educación Superior. (2010). Ecuador: Registro Oficial N° 298.

Martín Mateo, R. (1994). El sistema administrativo clásico y su permeabilidad a los nuevos paradigmas de la calidad total. Revista de administración pública (134), 7-28. España.

Morales Tobar, M. (2011). Manual de Derecho Procesal Administrativo. Quito: Talleres de la CEP.

Moreta, A. (2019). Procedimiento Administrativo y Sancionador en el COA. Quito, Ecuador: Tendencia Legal.

Munar Castellanos, L. R., & Ortiz Arciniegas, L. R. (2019). Derecho procesal administrativo y de lo contencioso administrativo. Bogotá: Editorial Temis S.A.

Muñoz, A. (1999). La gestión de la calidad total en la adminsitración pública. Madrid: Díaz de Santos.

Pérez, E. (2018). Manual del Derecho Administrativo (Cuarta ed.). Quito, Ecuador: Talleres - CEP.

Pérez, E. (2019). Manual de Derecho Administrativo (Quinta ed.). Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Temis S.A.

Pérez, E. (2020). Manual de derecho procesal administrativo (Segunda ed.). Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Temis S.A.

Prats Catalá, J. (1995). Derecho y management en las administraciones públicas. Ekonomiaz. Revista vasca de economía, (26), 130-143. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/273968.pdf

Downloads

Published

2021-07-16

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 7 (2021): Kairós, Revista de Ciencias Económicas, Jurídicas y Administrativas

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Kairos: Journal of Economy, Law and Administrative Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright

By submitting his work to Kairós, Journal of economic, law and administrative sciences, the author assigns the editor in a non-exclusive manner the rights of reproduction, publication, public communication, distribution and transformation so that it can be published in the journal in electronic version and can be consulted from the magazine's website.

Likewise, the authors authorize their article to be published under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-NC-ND license.

The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-NC-ND license.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work electronically (for example, in institutional repositories or on their own website) after publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation. of published works (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite

The Principle of quality: your challenges from administrative law in Ecuador. (2021). Kairos: Journal of Economy, Law and Administrative Sciences, 4(7), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.37135/kai.03.07.01